are you a dom?

[Lisais mine]

first, i would point out that Oz submits


I have to dissagree almost entirely. arrogance and confidence seem to be great aphrodisiacs to Submissives, and though the Dominant should always have his charge's best interests at heart, there is a quanity of use and abuse that may be required.

certianly a submissive must be totally rspected- that is the nature of any loving relationship- but sometimes, the dominant must act from the perspective of his or her own desires, therefore fufilling hte sub's need to be of service.

how many subs do sincerely desire to walk behind their dominant? i say that this would require a regal attitude.. which is by nature devoid of humility, and filledwith a sense of the knowledge that the Dominant knows what is best.

[Ozme52]

first, i would point out that Oz submits

Yeah, I expected someone to comment on my HUGE vocabulary, which is a reflection of my HUGE lexi-GRAPHIC oratory organ.

[Ozme52]

I have to dissagree almost entirely. arrogance and confidence seem to be great aphrodisiacs to Submissives, and though the Dominant should always have his charge's best interests at heart, there is a quanity of use and abuse that may be required.

certianly a submissive must be totally rspected- that is the nature of any loving relationship- but sometimes, the dominant must act from the perspective of his or her own desires, therefore fufilling hte sub's need to be of service.

how many subs do sincerely desire to walk behind their dominant? i say that this would require a regal attitude.. which is by nature devoid of humility, and filledwith a sense of the knowledge that the Dominant knows what is best.

Correct, though I would call it confident arrogance.

[jeanne]

- but sometimes, the dominant must act from the perspective of his or her own desires, therefore fufilling the sub's need to be of service.

I believe that you hit the nail on the head here. My Owner has verbalized the very same concept to me, one that I wholeheartedly agree with. Thanks!