Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: I am confused

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    27
    Post Thanks / Like
    Well, that is the thing Oz. Consensual is a big part of this whole thing. So, by setting the limit and his accepting that limit (I assume that not stating a problem with it is accepting it), it took away my right to negotiate if he felt that poly was a given for him. I am a bit confused as to your reference that D/s and poly are two separate things. Are you saying that poly doesn't fall under Dom limits? (not sure if that made ANY sense but try and work with me here - I am a bit muddled). To me, SSC is a big deal. He has always spoken about it as being a big deal. If we had spoken about this in true D/s fashion, is it out of line for me to believe that it should have been put out there immediately given that I expressed a need for monogamous. The fact that nothing was said about it makes this, to me, a breach of trust. On a human level. Hmmmm, okay never mind, I think I just answered my own question as to the '2 separate issues' thing. This posting was really just me trying to get at whether there was a D/s issue that I was not understanding in all of this.

    Thank you so much VaAugusta for your input. This is such a beautiful lifestyle as such that everyone is allowed their feelings and opinions. So I am not judging the poly lifestyle, although it is really something I would have to think about for myself, and if it was going to be poly it would have to be poly for both of us. I guess that is the issue. I wasn't given the opportunity to make taht decsion, which is a cornerstone of D/s when choosing a partner if I understand it correctly. Thank you so much for your well wishes.

  2. #2
    Away
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    N. California
    Posts
    9,249
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by spicennice View Post
    Well, that is the thing Oz. Consensual is a big part of this whole thing. So, by setting the limit and his accepting that limit (I assume that not stating a problem with it is accepting it), it took away my right to negotiate if he felt that poly was a given for him.
    Indeed. So far, you're correct.
    I am a bit confused as to your reference that D/s and poly are two separate things. Are you saying that poly doesn't fall under Dom limits? (not sure if that made ANY sense but try and work with me here - I am a bit muddled).
    My statement that D/s and poly are separate was to the point that you can be poly and not also be D/s... and that you can be D/s but not poly. (I thought I was pretty clear given the example I gave...)
    To me, SSC is a big deal. He has always spoken about it as being a big deal. If we had spoken about this in true D/s fashion, is it out of line for me to believe that it should have been put out there immediately given that I expressed a need for monogamous. The fact that nothing was said about it makes this, to me, a breach of trust. On a human level. Hmmmm, okay never mind, I think I just answered my own question as to the '2 separate issues' thing. This posting was really just me trying to get at whether there was a D/s issue that I was not understanding in all of this.
    The whole mistake here is thinking of poly v. mono as some kind of limit. It's not. It's a condition of the relationship. D/s is often about exploring boundaries and limits and even pushing them.

    So if you and your dom discussed it as a limit, then I can understand, (though not necessarily condone,) why he is pushing you... or has made the assumption that your limit doesn't necessarily apply to him.

    That he didn't say so is another matter. He should have been clear with you about this... but probably thought it a deal breaker.

    So is that who you want? Someone who avoids that conversation?

    The bottom line is that you have the right to break off the relationship and you know this but you want to force your dominant to comply with the rules you thought you both agreed to rather than move on, having found out he didn't communicate in good faith, or at least to your understanding of it...

    but you don't get to "force" him to do anything. Not and still call yourself the submissive. And even if you could, would you want to? It's what makes vanilla relationships go sour after the passion wears off, this desire to "possess" a partner, it certainly won't work with someone who is a dominant, and shouldn't work for you, someone who is submissive and presumably prefers to be possessed.
    The Wizard of Ahhhhhhhs



    Chief Magistrate - Emerald City

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top