Why is three years of ownership the same as 30 years of vanilla relationship?
Why is three years of ownership the same as 30 years of vanilla relationship?
I'm curious to know the answer to this as well. I could understand that with a BDSM relationship it requires more. At least in my opinion. For instance, effort, trust, communication... These are all things that will increase in a D/s relationship. I feel though that my year of devotion to my Master is still a year. In all honesty, I have zero desire to serve another... Ever. I've thought about the possibility of being able to, but it always comes back to the same thought. I don't think I could.
Also a comment was made about worth. I feel its a great point. Even though jealousy surfaces on occasion with new "threats", my Master saying things such as: I'm so proud of you -and- you are My one and only -and- you are the only cherry on ky cherry tree ... Well, it's the reassurance that I need to make all jealousy subside. If you have an honest relationship, comments of reassurance must be taken at face value and should in turn be comforting.
~It is the summer of my smiles - Flee from me Keepers of the Gloom. - Speak to me only with your eyes. - It is to you I give this tune.~
Strictly a personal opinion of course... and I maintain both vanilla and kink relationships (being poly and/or open,) I just think that the intensity of emotions one feels between a dominant and submissive, are more intense with higher highs and lower lows, more fulfilling, and in some ways, more prone to love/lust "at first sight" fulfillment and burnout, than vanilla. Master/slave relationships, that are based on emotional bonds, may be even moreso in intensity.Originally Posted by ksst, scarlet, et.al.
So a three year commitment is like a 30 year vanilla relationship and those aren't disposed of as readily as a relationship of shorter term.
The Wizard of Ahhhhhhhs
Chief Magistrate - Emerald City
And yes, I am obsessive.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Members who have read this thread: 0